The High Court of Delhi disposed of Income Tax Appeal ITA 952/2017 without deciding the merits, holding that the issues had become academic.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
JAKHOTIA PLASTICS PVT. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Dr.Rakesh Gupta with Ms.Monika Ghai, Mr.Rohit K.Gupta and Ms.Tani Malik, Advocates.
versus
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-3
..... Respondent Through: Mr.Abhishek Malhotra, Sr.Standing Counsel with Mr.Pratyaksh Gupta and Ms.Nupur Sharma, Advocates.
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA
O R D E R
% 07.02.2020
Counsel for the Appellant states that the issue in the present appeal has been rendered academic and is accordingly not pressed. The appeal is disposed of as such.
S.MURALIDHAR, J
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
A.K.CHAWLA, J
FEBRUARY 07, 2020/ tr
Jakhotia Plastics Pvt. Ltd.
PR. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-3
S.Muralidhar
Rajiv Shakdher
A.K.Chawla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
