Allowed
Dalip Kumar v. Santosh Kumar
Delhi HCCS(OS)/453/2019
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The court decreed a partition suit following a mediated settlement agreement. The original plaintiff was substituted by legal heirs. A certificate for refund of court fees was issued.
What did the court decide?
Suit decreed in terms of settlement agreement; refund of court fees under Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870; suit disposed of.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~21
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- CS(OS) 453/2019 with I.A. 12150/2019 & I.A. 18370/2019
¶4
DALIP KUMAR ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr.B.P.Singh, Advocate with LRs of Plaintiff.
¶5
- versus
¶6
SANTOSH KUMAR ..... Defendant Through: Ms.Yamini Rana, Advocate
¶7
CORAM:
¶8
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
¶9
- O R D E R
¶10
- % 05.02.2020
¶11
- The present suit for partition was filed by the original plaintiff against the defendant, who is his brother. During the pendency of the suit, the plaintiff passed away on 16.11.2019. By an order of the Joint Registrar dated 23.12.2019, the application for substitution of the plaintiff was allowed, and the plaintiff was substituted by his legal heirs, namely his wife-Smt. Renu Aggarwal; his son-Sh.Abhinav Aggarwal; his daughter-in-law-Smt.Divya Aggarwal, who is the wife of Sh.Abhishek Aggarwal [pre-deceased son of the original plaintiff]; Baby Mehak Aggarwal, daughter of late Sh.Abhishek Aggarwal, who is represented by her mother-Smt.Divya Aggarwal; and his daughter Smt.Shweta Mittal.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
RENU AGGARWAL
- petitioner
SH.ABHINAV AGGARWAL
- petitioner
DIVYA AGGARWAL
- petitioner
SHWETA MITTAL
- respondent
SANTOSH KUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court