Lease Deed executed between them; (iv) that subsequent thereto the plaintiff has been in actual and constructive possession of the aforesaid portion and has been using it for its official purpose and neither the defendant no.2 nor B.K.Khanna & Company Pvt. Ltd. were in possession thereof; (v) that the entire property no.1-E/6 was put to auction by the Income Tax Office for recovery of income tax dues from B.K.Khanna & Company Pvt. Ltd. and the defendant no.1, in the said auction held on 6th June, 1985, purchased the said property and a certificate of sale dated 14th January, 1986 was issued in favour of the defendant no.1; (vi) that the plaintiff has always denied the manner in which the defendant no.1 has become the title holder of the property “as the plaintiff being in possession of the suit premises has always asserted their right as hostile title holder”; (vii) that the defendant no.1 was well aware of the exclusive possession of the plaintiff and claim of the plaintiff as owner; (viii) that the defendant no.1, immediately after issuance of certificate of sale in its favour, filed eviction petition before the Rent Controller against the plaintiff, as the plaintiff was in exclusive possession of the property; (ix) that the said eviction petition was dismissed by the Rent Controller; (x) that the defendant no.1 on 20th August, 1990 filed another suit for possession and recovery of monies against the plaintiff, again impleading the plaintiff only as the defendant; (xi) that the said suit has also been dismissed vide judgment dated 2nd January, 2014; (xii) that the plaintiff, since late 1980s has always been in possession and has all licenses, registrations in its favour at the address of the aforesaid premises and the electricity connection in the said premises is also in the name of the plaintiff; (xiii) that the plaintiff has been bearing all maintenance expenses and other expenses with respect to the said premises, including in keeping
