to Delhi and visited Arun and Mohiney and the issue of conversion of leasehold rights in the land underneath the property into freehold was mooted; (vi) however the husband of the plaintiff No.1 was not interested; (vii) that it was then that Arun, son of Mohiney, who was residing in the property told the husband of the plaintiff No.1 that he was prepared to purchase the property from the plaintiffs and after telephonic discussions with the plaintiffs, it was finally mutually agreed around 15th March, 2005 that the ground floor shall be sold by the plaintiffs to Arun for a consideration of Rs.50 lacs and Arun would pay for stamp duty etc.; (viii) that a cash sum of Rs.5 lacs was payable forthwith and Rs.27 lacs was payable on demand in the year 2005, as per requirements and demands of the plaintiffs; (ix) that the balance payment of Rs.18 lacs was to be made at the time of execution of the Sale Deed by plaintiffs in favour of Arun; (x) that a sum of Rs.5 lacs in cash was paid at the time of Agreement to Sell around 15th March, 2005 and Rs.27 lacs was paid thereafter between 23rd May, 2005 and 8th November, 2005, in instalments, in cash, save for the instalment of Rs.6 lacs and Rs.4 lacs paid on 27th October, 2005 and 8th November, 2005 by cheque in the name of plaintiff No.1; (xi) that in November, 2005, leasehold rights of the land underneath the property were converted into freehold and since the plaintiffs had already agreed to sell the ground floor to Arun, the entire expense for conversion was borne by Arun; (xii) because both Arun and Mohiney were ailing, the formal execution of Sale Deed by plaintiffs in favour of Arun remained pending; (xiii) however, during the meeting on 2nd January, 2013, V.T. Wadhwani, being the husband of the plaintiff No.1, while admitting receipt of Rs.32 lacs from Arun, denied having agreed to sell the ground floor and offered to return the
