The court dismissed the suit along with the injunction application as withdrawn by the plaintiff. However, on payment of costs, the plaintiff was granted liberty to sue again on the same cause of action.
Suit and I.A. 3309/2019 dismissed as withdrawn; liberty to sue afresh granted upon payment of costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1
INTEC INFRA-TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED
..... Plaintiff
Through Mr.Vinay Kumar Garg, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Sumit Roy, Adv., Mr.Varun Pandey, Adv. & Mr.Shubham Rathore, Adv.
versus
BIM INTEGRATED SERVICES PVT. LTD. & ORS....Defendant Through Mr.Sanjay Sharma, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
O R D E R % 14.02.2020
CS(COMM) 121/2019 Page No.1 of 2
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J
FEBRUARY 14, 2020/aa..
CS(COMM) 121/2019
Page No.2 of 2
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw
As recorded by the court registry
A suit of a commercial nature above the specified value, governed by the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
