In this withdrawn petition, the petitioner, a farmer, sought parole for three months to sow and harvest crops. The court directed him to first apply for furlough via proper channel, with the authority to decide within 15 days.
Petitioner directed to apply for furlough within proper channels; petition disposed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
Through Mr. Ravi Dabas, Advocate
versus
STATE OF (G.N.C.T) OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Mr. Amanpreet Singh, Advocate for Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel (Criminal) with SI Sunil Kumar, P.S.: Kanjhawla, Delhi
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI
O R D E R % 27.02.2020
The petitioner has prayed for parole of three months for sowing and harvesting of crops, as the petitioner is a farmer.
Nominal roll of the petitioner filed.
Status report also filed.
Learned counsel for the State submits that the petitioner is supposed to avail the furlough first and only then can he move a petition for parole.
Let the petitioner apply for furlough first to the competent authority i.e. The Deputy Secretary (Home), Home (General) Department, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, Delhi Sachivalya, 5th Level, ‘C’ Wing, I.P. Estate, New Delhi. The competent authority is directed to decide the furlough
application of the petitioner within a period of 15 days after the same is filed.
In view of the above, learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition with a liberty to move a petition for parole later on.
The petition stands disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty as aforesaid.
BRIJESH SETHI, J
FEBRUARY 27, 2020 savita
Sanjay
State of (G.N.C.T) of Delhi
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
