Kamal Tyagi @ Tinu v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought parole extension due to wife's surgery and mother's cancer. Court extended parole for seven weeks based on medical conditions despite State's note on other relatives.
What did the court decide?
Parole extended for seven weeks from the date of order.
What the court decided
$~19
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(CRL) 3620/2019
KAMAL TYAGI @ TINU ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Hemendra Jailiya, Advocate. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ranbir Singh Kundu, ASC with Mr. Shivam Sharan and Mr. Hitesh Vali, Advocates with SI Ajay PS Palam Airport and SI Ajay Kumar.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR
O R D E R % 07.01.2020
By way of the present petition, the petitioner seeks extension of parole on the ground that his wife has undergone throat surgery on 25.12.2019 and she has been advised bed rest for six weeks. One other ground is that mother of the petitioner is a cancer patient and she is also under treatment and there is no one else except the petitioner to look after the two ladies.
State has filed a status report confirming the ailments of the mother and wife of the petitioner, however, it is stated that other relatives are there to look after the petitioner’s wife and mother.
Keeping in view the facts and circumstances and the medical conditions of the mother and wife of the petitioner, parole of the
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
KAMAL TYAGI @ TINU
- respondent
STATE
Coram
RAJNISH BHATNAGAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court