State v. Ajay Goel
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Delhi rejected the State's petition for leave to appeal against an acquittal. The trial court had acquitted the respondent due to the inability to trace material witnesses in a case involving rash driving and death.
What did the court decide?
null
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~16
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CRL.L.P. 4/2020
STATE ..... Petitioner
Through: Ms Kusum Dhalla, APP for State with SI Pankaj Saroha, PS Paschim Vihar East.
versus
AJAY GOEL ..... Respondent Through
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R % 07.01.2020
CRL.M.A. 58/2020
- Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
CRL.L.P. 4/2020 & CRL.M.A. 57/2020 & CRL.M.A. 59/2020
- The State has filed the present petition seeking leave to impugn the judgment dated 10.07.2019 passed by the MM-10 (West), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi acquitting the respondent of committing an offence under Sections 279/337/304-A of the IPC.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether this Court should interfere with the trial court's acquittal of the respondent on the ground that material witnesses were not traceable.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
State
- respondent
Ajay Goel
Coram
Vibhu Bakhu
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court