The Delhi High Court exercised its power under Section 34(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to dispose of two connected arbitration petitions. Upon recording a full and final settlement agreement executed on 07.01.2020, the Court concluded that no impediment existed for disposal and accordingly discharged the petitions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~20 & 21
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ O.M.P. (COMM) 104/2017
M/S RITES LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Appearance not given.
versus
M/S NARAINDAS R. ISRANI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.G.S.Chaturvedi, Advocate
+ O.M.P. (COMM) 96/2020
M/S NARAINDAS R. ISRANI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.G.S.Chaturvedi, Advocate
versus
M/S RITES LIMITED AND ANOTHER ..... Respondents Through: Appearance not given.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
O R D E R % 13.02.2020
letters in favour of both the signatories have been placed on record. The settlement agreement is also signed by counsel for both the parties and the learned mediator.
PRATEEK JALAN, J
FEBRUARY 13, 2020 „hkaur‟/s
O.M.P. (COMM) 104/2017 & Other Connected Matter
Page 2 of 2
M/s Rites Ltd
M/s Naraindas R. Israni
M/s Naraindas R. Israni
M/s Rites Limited
Prateek Jalan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
