The appellant's appeal in this Central Excise Act Case was disposed of as not pressed. The court reserved liberty for the appellant to file appropriate proceedings before the appropriate forum.
Liberty to file appropriate proceedings before the appropriate forum in accordance with law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1
TAJ MAHAL HOTEL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sandeep Narain, Adv.
versus
COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX –DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Bansal, SSC with Mr.Aman Rewaria, Ms. Vipasha Mishra & Mr. Akhil Kulshrestha, Advs. for R-1
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
O R D E R
% 14.01.2020
Counsel appearing for the appellant, upon instructions, submits that he is not pressing this Central Excise Act Case and prays that liberty be reserved with this appellant to file appropriate proceedings before appropriate forum in accordance with law.
This Central Excise Act Case is disposed of as not pressed with liberty aforesaid.
CHIEF JUSTICE
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
JANUARY 14, 2020 ns
TAJ MAHAL HOTEL
COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX – DELHI
C. Hari Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
