Kumar, he implicated the petitioner to save his skin. For this reason only Raj Kumar had falsely alleged that a sum of Rs.12,55,000/- was given by him to the petitioner in cash. It is further submitted that in the FIR No. 384/2019 , the allegation levelled against the petitioner is that he had received a sum of Rs.12,55,000/- from the complainant- Raj Kumar but it is not revealed towards what account the said payment was made, as the petitioner was only a facilitator between the complainant – Raj Kumar and the accused persons and since the project was not completed, no occasion for payment of commission arose. It is submitted that the allegation of receiving the amount of Rs.12,55,000/- is blatantly false because all the payments were made to the account of the accused-Company through RTGS or bank transaction and also that in the FIR in question, it is not mentioned that for what purpose and for whom the sum of Rs.12,55,000/was received by the petitioner or that the petitioner had received the said amount for and on behalf of the accused- Company. It is pointed out that the FIR mentions particularly all dates of payments but so far the receiving of Rs.12,55,000/- is concerned, it mentions only August, 2017 and no specific date has been mentioned.
