Tarun v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
In a bail application for anticipatory bail, the High Court of Delhi granted bail conditioned on a monetary bond and joining the investigation when called upon.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner admitted to bail on furnishing Rs.15,000/- bond and local surety in like amount, subject to joining investigation.
What the court decided
$~12
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- BAIL APPLN. 3187/2019
TARUN ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Vijay Kinger & Ms.Roopa Nagpal, Advocates
| Versus | ||
|---|---|---|
| STATE | ..... Respondent | |
| Through: | Mr.Tarang Srivastava, Additional | |
| Public Prosecutor for State with SI | ||
| K.P.Singh P.S.: Nand Nagri |
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI
O R D E R % 10.02.2020
Petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in FIR No. 608/2019, registered at police station Nand Nagri, Delhi for the offences under Sections 308/323/34 IPC on the ground that he has been falsely implicated in this case.
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that in the MLC the injuries are opined to be simple in nature and that after grant of interim protection by this Court, petitioner has already joined the investigation and his custodial interrogation is not at all required and therefore, petitioner be granted protection from arrest in this case.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner warrants anticipatory bail given his false implication and simple injury nature.
Whether the petitioner deserves relief from arrest pending investigation in the implicated case.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Tarun
- respondent
State
Coram
Brijesh Sethi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court