An application for anticipatory bail in a fake visa racket was dismissed. The Court upheld the Trial Court's rejection, citing the accused's lack of initial cooperation, failure to trace other leads, and dispute over a financial undertaking.
The application for anticipatory bail was dismissed with no orders passed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:AM UL YA
persons at the cost of ? 1.2 lacs.
/-,
It
s.
VIBHUBAKIIRU,J
JAISLARY 09,2020/RK
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted in a fake visa racket case where the accused failed to cooperate initially and disputed an undertaking made by his counsel.
Whether custodial interrogation is warranted despite the accused joining the investigation.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of MaharashtraReferred¶11
Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.: AIR 2011 SC 312 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner
Complainant
VIBHU R. GOKLANY
JAISALYAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
