In a petition under Section 11(6)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for arbitrator appointment, respondent counsel stated active proceedings. Petitioner counsel sought withdrawal. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn upon the parties agreeing to appear before the learned arbitrator.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~19
IMRAN KHAN & ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. K.K. Sharma and Mr. S. Khan, Advs.
versus CAPITAL FIRST HOME FINANCE LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Gurpreet singh and Mr. Shivaang Gupta, Advs.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
% 14.01.2020
This is a petition filed by the petitioner under Section 11(6)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of an Arbitrator. Mr. Gurpreet Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondent states, the present petition is totally misconceived as the arbitration proceedings are also going and the petitioners herein are appearing before the learned Arbitrator wherein they have also filed a reply to the claim petition. He also states that the next date of hearing before the learned Arbitrator is January 24, 2020.
If that be so, Mr. K.K. Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks to withdraw the petition and states that the petitioners herein shall appear before the learned Arbitrator on the date fixed.
The petition and the connected application are dismissed as withdrawn.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
JANUARY 14, 2020 /jg
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition for appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11(6)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 should be allowed or dismissed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
IMRAN KHAN AND ANR.
CAPITAL FIRST HOME FINANCE LTD.
V. KAMESWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
