The High Court of Delhi, on the respondent's consent, appointed Mr. K. Venkatraman as Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate a commercial dispute under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 201996.
Appointment of Mr. K. Venkatraman as Sole Arbitrator regulated by DIAC Rules.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~16
versus
M/S SPACE TELELINK LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajesh Kr., Adv.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
O R D E R % 13.01.2020
This petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of a Sole Arbitrator.
Learned counsel appearing for the respondent states that he has no objection for the appointment of a Sole Arbitrator by this Court. Noting the subject matter of dispute, this Court appoints Mr.K. Venkatraman, Advocate (Mob: 9810387820) as a Sole Arbitrator who shall adjudicate the disputes and differences between the parties. The appointment of the Arbitrator shall be regulated by the Rules of DIAC.
Let a copy of this order be sent to Mr. K. Venkatraman, Advocate. Petition is disposed of.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
JANUARY 13, 2020 /aky
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Court should appoint a Sole Arbitrator pursuant to Section 11(6) of the arbitration law.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/S Servitor Intelligence Services
M/S Space Telink Ltd.
V. Kameswar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
