Petitioner sought to challenge an ejection order in a low-density urban area. The court dismissed the writ as premature pending execution and fixed the underlying appeal before the Deputy Commissioner.
Petition dismissed as premature; appeal fixed before Deputy Commissioner; DC directed to act within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~A-4
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SHRI AVTAR SINGH BAJAJ ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Rajesh Yadav and Ms.Ruchira, Advs.
versus
GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR...... Respondents Through Mr.Ramesh Singh, SC, GNCTD with Ms. Mrinalini Sen, Mr.Ishan Agrawal, Mr.Tanmay Yadav and Ms.Kritika Gupta, Advs.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH
O R D E R % 07.01.2020
residential area in urban extension. In view of the above, he submits that the Delhi Land Reforms Act would not be applicable to the present petition.
JAYANT NATH, J
JANUARY 07, 2020 rb
SHRI AVTAR SINGH BAJAJ
GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI
JAYANT NATH
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
