Saryu Prasad v. University of Delhi and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner appeared unrepresented in the default. The single-judge bench dismissed the writ petition without any substantive reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~21
versus
UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Bansal with Ms. Seema Dolo, Advs. for R-1/D.U. Mr. A.P.S. Ahluwalia, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.S. Ahluwalia and Mr. Mohit Bongwal, Advs. for R-2.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA O R D E R % 10.01.2020
W.P.(C) 5965/2016, CM APPL. 34097-34098/2018
None appears for the petitioner.
Dismissed in default.
A. K. CHAWLA, J
JANUARY 10, 2020
acm
Saryu Prasad
University of Delhi
Anonymous
A. K. Chawla
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court