In this writ petition seeking directions to demolish unauthorized construction, the court held that the matter was already pending before the ATMCD and Civil Court. Consequently, no further directions were issued, and the petition was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~A-18
ANAND TYAGI ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Pushp Saini and Mr.Ashwani Tyagi, Advs.
versus
SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR.
..... Respondent Through Mr.Dhanesh Relan, Standing counsel for SDMC with Ms.Komal Sorout and Ms.Kajri Gupta, Advs. for R-1 Mr.T.S.Nanda, Adv. for R-2 with SI Hukam Chand, PS Mehrauli Mr.G.D.Mishra, Adv. for R-4 and R-10
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH
O R D E R
% 10.02.2020
Hence, the present Writ Petition.
shall continue to deal with the property as per law. With the above directions, the petition stands disposed of. All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
JAYANT NATH, J
FEBRUARY 10, 2020 n
1 issue framed by the court
Whether further directions are required when ATMCD and Civil Court are already seized of the matter regarding the illegal construction.
ANAND TYAGI
SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
JAYANT NATH
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
