In this withdrawn writ petition, the petitioner sought leave to withdraw the petition seeking extradition of her husband after the respondents provided the current status of the complaint. The High Court of Delhi allowed the withdrawal with liberty.
Leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to take appropriate action in accordance with law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~54
Through: Mohd. Ali Khan, Mr.Omar Hoda, Mr.Kamran Khan, Advs.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Ms.Monika Arora, CGSC with Mr.Harsh Ahuja, Adv. for R-1. Mr.Shubham Gandhi, Adv. and Ms.Vinny Shangloo, GP, UOI.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA
O R D E R
CM 7582/2020
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
WP(C) 2153/2020
The learned counsel for the respondents has handed over the current status of the complaint filed by the petitioner seeking extradition of her husband.
In view of the same, the learned counsel for the petitioner prays for leave to withdraw the present petition with liberty to take appropriate action in accordance with law.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
NAVIN CHAWLA, J
FEBRUARY 27, 2020 RN
BHAVANA CHALASANI
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
Navin Chawla
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
