Writ petition challenging unauthorized construction dismissed as petition lacked personal right; demolition orders already in place.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~A-29
versus SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS..Respondent Through Mr.Ajjay Aroraa and Mr.Kapil Dutta, Advs. for SDMC Mr.Abhinav Singh, Adv. for R-2
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH
O R D E R
%
18.02.2020
This Writ Petition is filed by the petitioner seeking appropriate action against the illegal and unauthorised construction on plot bearing No.JH-8, Khirki Extension, New Delhi. A perusal of the Writ Petition shows that the petitioner resides in Okhla Village, New Delhi whereas the property for which relief is sought is in Khirki Extension, New Delhi. It is manifest that there is no personal right of the petitioner which has been affected.
That apart, learned counsel for respondent No.1 who appears on receipt of advance notice submits that demolition orders have been passed for the property in question and part demolition action was taken on 3.1.2020. It is manifest that the respondent No.1 is taking steps as per law regarding the stated unauthorised construction. They will continue to deal with the said property as per law.
Nothing further survives in this petition. Petition is disposed of. The concerned SHO will comply with the directions of respondent No.1.
FEBRUARY 18, 2020/ n
JAYANT NATH, J
Mohd Shahid
South Delhi Municipal Corporation
Jayant Nath
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
