The High Court of Delhi allowed a writ petition for pension benefits, directing the respondents to grant pro rata pension with arrears payable within 12 weeks, along with 6% interest for any delay, relying on three specific precedents.
Direction to grant pro rata pension with arrears to be paid within 12 weeks; 6% interest for delay.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~50
INDRAJEET KUMAR (EX SGT 763491-R) .... Petitioner
Through: Ms. Pallavi Awasthi, Advocate.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Atul Batra with Mr. Amit Kr. Dogra, Advocates.
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH
O R D E R % 10.02.2020
CM APPL. 5212/2020 (Exemption)
W.P.(C) 1502/2020
S.MURALIDHAR, J.
TALWANT SINGH, J.
FEBRUARY 10, 2020 abc
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to be granted pro rata pension with arrears upon verification of details.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Govind Kumar Srivastava v. Union of IndiaExplained¶14
W.P.(C) No. 10026/2016 (_Govind Kumar Srivastava v. Union of India_)
Mohammad Israr Khan v. Union of IndiaExplained¶14
W.P.(C) No. 5642/2019 (_Mohammad Israr Khan v. Union of India_)
Rakesh Kumar v. Union of IndiaExplained¶14
W.P. (C) 9524/2019 (_Rakesh Kumar v. Union of India_)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
INDRAJEET KUMAR
UNION OF INDIA
S.MURALIDHAR
TALWANT SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
