Disposed

Gautam Buddha Private Iti and Ors. v. Directorate General of Training

Delhi HC13 Feb 2020W.P.(C)/1117/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order disposed of multiple Writ petitions challenging the withdrawal of grace marks by the Directorate General of Training. The Court held that a subsequent circular effectively addressed the grievance and directed the issuance of fresh mark-sheets with grace marks.

What did the court decide?

Directed the Directorate General of Training to issue fresh mark-sheets with grace marks within two weeks.

Gautam Buddha Private Iti and Ors. Vs Directorate… — Education and Admissions | Delhi HC (2020)

¶1

$~39, 2 to 4, 24 to 28

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

W.P.(C) 1508/2020 & CM No.5219/2020 KUSUMRAJ PRIVATE ITI AND ORS. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Sharawat with Mr. Divyank Rana, Mr. Abhishek Dhankar and Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advs. versus

¶4

DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF TRAINING ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Arti Bansal, Adv. + W.P.(C) 1250/2020 & CM No.4320/2020 CHANDRA PRIVATE ITI AND ORS. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Sharawat with Mr. Divyank Rana, Mr. Abhishek Dhankar and Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advs. versus

¶5

DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF TRAINING ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Digpaul with Mr. Aaryan Verma, Advs. + W.P.(C) 1368/2020 & CM No.4759/2020 ASHA PRIVATE ITI AND ORS. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Sharawat with Mr. Divyank Rana, Mr. Abhishek Dhankar and Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advs. versus

¶6

W.P.(C) 1508/2020 & Conn.

¶7

1/5

¶8

DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF TRAINING ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Bhagwan Swarup Shukla with Mr. Gokul Sharm and Mr. Shrvan Kumar, Advs.

¶9

W.P.(C) 1435/2020 ITI CLUB OF INDIA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Amitesh Kumar with Ms. Binisa Mohanty and Ms. Priti Kumari, Advs. versus DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF TRAINING ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Gigi C. George, Adv.

¶10

W.P.(C) 1042/2020 & CM No.3459/2020 SAMRAT ASHOK PRIVATE ITI AND ORS. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Sharawat with Mr. Divyank Rana, Mr. Abhishek Dhankar and Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advs. versus

¶11

DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF TRAINING ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Bhagwan Swarup Shukla with Mr. Gokul Sharm and Mr. Shrvan Kumar, Advs.

¶12

W.P.(C) 1116/2020 & CM No.3720/2020 DALSINGHSARAI TECHNICAL PRIVATE ITI AND ORS. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Sharawat with Mr. Divyank Rana, Mr. Abhishek Dhankar and Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advs. versus

¶13

W.P.(C) 1508/2020 & Conn.

¶14

2/5

¶15

DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF TRAINING ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Bhagwan Swarup Shukla with Mr. Gokul Sharm and Mr. Shrvan Kumar, Advs.

¶16

W.P.(C) 1117/2020 & CM No.3721/2020

¶17

GAUTAM BUDDHA PRIVATE ITI AND ORS. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Sharawat with Mr. Divyank Rana, Mr. Abhishek Dhankar and Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advs.

¶18

versus

¶19

DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF TRAINING ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Bhagwan Swarup Shukla with Mr. Gokul Sharm and Mr. Shrvan Kumar, Advs.

¶20

+ W.P.(C) 1119/2020 & CM No	.3726/2020
BUDDHA TECHNICAL ITC	AND ORS.	..	... Pet	itioner
Through:	Mr. San	jay Shar	awat	with Mr.
	Divyank	Rana,	Mr.	Abhishek
	Dhankar Advs.	and Mr.	Ash	ok Kumar,
versus

¶21

DIRECTORATE GENERAL	OF TRAINING	..	... Re	spondent
Through:	Mr. Bhagwan Mr. Gokul Sh Kumar, Advs.	Swa arm	rup and	Shukla with Mr. Shrvan
+ W.P.(C) 1122/2020 & CM No	.3729/2020
MULTI CRAFT PRIVATE IT	I AND ORS.	..	... Pe	titioner
Through:	Mr. Sanjay	Shar	awat	with Mr.
	Divyank Ra	na,	Mr.	Abhishek
	Dhankar and Advs.	Mr.	As	hok Kumar,
W.P.(C) 1508/2020 & Conn.				3/5

¶22

versus

¶23

DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF TRAINING ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Bhagwan Swarup Shukla with Mr. Gokul Sharm and Mr. Shrvan Kumar, Advs.

¶24

CORAM:

¶25

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER

¶26

O R D E R

¶27

% 13.02.2020

¶28

In the captioned matters, principally, challenge is laid to the notification dated 9.1.2020 issued by the respondent/Directorate General of Training (hereafter referred to as “DGT”).

¶29

Via this notification, the provision for grace mark, which was available up until then, was sought to be withdrawn. Since then, the DGT has, concededly, issued a clarification on 7.2.2020 making applicable the notification dated 9.1.2020 to those trainees, who would be admitted in August 2019 session and thereafter.

¶30

2.1 This clarification, which has been issued via Circular dated 7.2.2020 reads as under:

¶31

“... In continuation of this office letter even no. dated 09.01.2020 on the subject mentioned above, it is clarified that all the changes including no grace mark provision will be applicable for the trainees admitted in the session August, 2019 and onwards...”

¶32

Given the aforesaid clarification, the main grievance of the petitioners in the captioned matters stands addressed. Therefore, the DGT will issue fresh mark-sheets to the petitioners taking into account the provision in place for grant of grace marks prior to notification dated 9.1.2020.

¶33

3.1 This exercise will be completed within the next two weeks. W.P.(C) 1508/2020 & Conn. 4/5

¶34

The captioned petitions are disposed of in the aforementioned terms.

¶35

Resultantly, pending applications shall stand closed.

¶36

Dasti .

¶37

RAJIV SHAKDHER, J

¶38

FEBRUARY 13, 2020 /pmc

¶39

W.P.(C) 1508/2020 & Conn. 5/5

Gautam Buddha Private Iti and Ors. v. Directorate General of Training

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gautam Buddha Private Iti and Ors. v. Directorate General of Training

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajasthan Delhi Education Society and Anr. Vs National Council for Teacher Education and Anr.

Rajasthan Delhi Education Society and Anr. Vs National Council for Teacher Education and Anr.

Girish Chandra and Ors. Vs Union of India and Ors.

A N Chandankar & Anr. Vs Union of India & Ors.

Jindal Public School Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Manoj Kumar Gupta Vs East Delhi Corporation of Delhi & Anr.

Non Government Educational Institutions Directors Association Vs Union of India and Anr.

Sh. Bharat Bhushan Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Rajasthan Delhi Education Society and Anr. Vs National Council for Teacher Education and Anr.

Rajasthan Delhi Education Society and Anr. Vs National Council for Teacher Education and Anr.

M/S Nimitaya Hotel and Resorts Limited and Anr. Vs Allahabad Bank

Samrat Ashok Private Iti and Ors. Vs Directorate General of Training

Buddha Technical Itc and Ors. Vs Directorate General of Training

Multi Craft Private Iti and Ors. Vs Directorate General of Training