Disposed

Mohammad Zafir v. Tata Sons Ltd. & Ors.

Delhi HC5 Feb 2019RFA(OS)/29/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The appeal against an order dated 17.01.2018 and a decree in CS(OS) No.1046/2012 was disposed of as not pressed. Parties had arrived at an amicable settlement where the appellant undertook to pay Rs.2,00,000/- to satisfy the decree, upon which it would be satisfied and a letter issued.

What did the court decide?

The appeal is disposed of as not pressed, with direction to the appellant to pay Rs.2,00,000/- within three months to satisfy the decree.

Mohammad Zafir Vs Tata Sons Ltd. & Ors. — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Delhi HC (2019)

¶1

$~20

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

RFA(OS) 29/2018 MOHAMMAD ZAFIR ..... Appellant Through: Mr.G.D.Chopra and Mr.Afroz Ahmad, Advocates along with Appellant in person.

¶4

versus TATA SONS LTD & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Pravin Anand, Mr.A. Sreekumar and Mr.Akshay Agarwal, Advocates.

¶5

CORAM:

¶6

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH O R D E R % 05.02.2019

¶7

CM.APPL. 19624/2018

¶8

This is an application filed by applicant/appellant seeking condonation of 27 days delay in filing the appeal.

¶9

For the reasons stated in the application, the delay in filing appeal is condoned.

¶10

The application stands disposed of.

¶11

RFA(OS) 29/2018

¶12

By the present appeal, the appellant has made a prayer to allow the appeal and set aside the judgment/order of this court dated 17.01.2018 and decree passed by the learned Single Judge in CS (OS) No.1046/2012 titled as ‘Tata Sons Limited vs. Mohammad Zafir & Ors’ and award nominal

¶13

damages and counsels’ fee of Rs.8500/- (Rupees Eight Thousand Five Hundred only).

¶14

This matter has been adjourned from time to time to enable the parties to arrive at an amicable resolution with regard to payment of cost awarded by the learned Single Judge. Parties have arrived at an amicable settlement. It is prayed that the appeal be disposed of in terms of the settlement. It is agreed and undertaken by the appellant that he would pay a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- to the respondent within three months from today. On payment of the said amount, the decree would stand satisfied and a satisfaction letter would be issued by the respondent to the appellant.

¶15

Needless to mention, if the amount is not paid, it would be open for the respondent to execute the decree.

¶16

In view of the settlement arrived at, the appeal is disposed of, as not pressed.

¶17

We make it clear that in case sum of Rs.2,00,000/- is paid within three months, the decree would stand satisfied.

¶18

The payment shall be made in the name of Tata Sons Pvt. Ltd.

¶19

G.S.SISTANI, J

¶20

JYOTI SINGH, J

¶21

FEBRUARY 05, 2019 ssc RFA(OS) 29/2018

¶22

Page 2 of 2

Mohammad Zafir v. Tata Sons Ltd. & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohammad Zafir v. Tata Sons Ltd. & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gautam Gambhir Vs D a P & Co. and Anr.

Bharti Vs Ramji Yadav

Mangat Ram & Anr. Vs Deputy Commissioner Sadar Paharganj Zone & Ors.

Vikram Vij Vs Anju Vij @ Anju Ahuja

Prashant Prakash Sahni Vs Devika Mehra

Bhavna Rajput Vs Vipin