to understand the terms of the settlement, the plaintiff was forced to withdraw the suit. Another ground raised was that the parties were taken by surprise, offer was made in court on the same date cheques were handed over and parties were forced to make a settlement and sign the order sheet. We find no force in the settlement made by learned senior counsels appearing for the appellants for the reason that not only the parties were present at the time of settlement, the counsels as well as the parties have signed the order-sheet. In case, the settlement was only with respect to the Green Park property, there was no reason to plaintiff to withdraw the entire suit. To say that they were taken away by surprise. Reading of the order would show that the parties were in fact, negotiating for a settlement prior to 25.07.2018 as well. Mr.Aggarwal, submits that the defendants had handed over to the plaintiff a family settlement in January, 2017 which was then handed over by the plaintiff to the local commissioner and forms part of the record of the Local Commissioner and filed before the Single Judge, which would also in fact suggest that the settlement offered and considered was composite in nature and not with respect to only one property. We also find that post the settlement having been arrived at on 25.07.2018, order-sheet having been signed by the parties and their respective counsels would show that the appellants were not without legal help or assistance and thus, it cannot be said that they were misled or coerced and fraud has been played upon them and the parties having signed the order-sheet, accepted the settlement, we are unable to find any infirmity in the view taken by the Single Judge. The appellant cannot be permitted to wriggle out of the settlement as on such grounds and moreover there
