The High Court of Delhi allowed a joint application to record a compromise. The respondent accepted Rs. 40 lacs in full satisfaction of claims. The appeal and associated application under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC were disposed of.
Order 23 Rule 3 CPC application allowed; appeal disposed as compromised; bank guarantee discharged and returned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~23
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
DAV COLLAGE TRUST & MANAGEMENT SOCIETY & ANR
..... Appellants Through: Mrs. Rakhi Ray, Advocate with Mr. Vaibhav Gulia, Advocate. (M. No.9818649297).
versus
M G KATYAL ..... Respondent Through: Respondent in person (M. No.9810093207).
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA O R D E R % 05.02.2019
C.M. No.5561/2019(under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC) & RFA No.715/2018
Rs.40 lacs bearing no.423578 dated 2.2.2019 drawn on OBC Bank, Paharganj Branch, Delhi.
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J
FEBRUARY 05, 2019 Ne
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal should be disposed of by recording a compromise agreement between the parties.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dav Collage Trust & Management Society
M G Katyal
Valmikij Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
