Mohd Akram & Anr. v. Safdar Ali & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
In default, applications CM Appl. 2292/2021 and 2293/2021 were dismissed by the Delhi High Court as no one appeared for the applicants.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
KAMLESH KUMAR
21.01.2021 22:54
$~62
MOHD AKRAM & ANR ..... Petitioners
Through: None.
versus SAFDAR ALI & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Anant Agarwal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
The hearing was conducted through video conferencing.
CM APPL. 2292/2021 (fresh by petitioner seeking extension of time for vacation of suit premises) & CM APPL. 2293/2021 (exemption)
NAJMI WAZIRI, J
JANUARY 21, 2021 AB
Mohd Akram & Anr
Saifdar Ali & Anr
Najmi Waziri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court