The petitioner, through a writ petition, challenged an order allowing the respondent leave to defend on grounds of insufficient accommodation. The court disposed of the petition by directing the Trial Court to expedite the trial within one year.
Direction to the learned Trial Court to make endeavour to complete the trial within one year.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~21
..... Petitioner Through : Mr.Nagender Yadav and Mr.Gaurav Kumar Singh, Advocates. versus
BHAGMAL SINGH
..... Respondent
Through : Mr.N.S.Negi, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA O R D E R % 13.02.2019
Petitioner assails the impugned order dated 24.02.2018 whereby the leave to defend application of the respondent was allowed on the ground that though the petitioner herein is in possession of the accommodation, but such accommodation is insufficient and as such pleaded for additional accommodation.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits he shall be satisfied if the petition is disposed of with a direction to the learned Trial Court to expedite the trial.
In view of above, this petition stands disposed of with the direction to the learned Trial Court to make endeavour to complete the trial, preferably, within a period of one year. Copy of this order be communicated to the learned Trial Court for information. No order as to costs.
YOGESH KHANNA, J.
FEBRUARY 13, 2019
M
Yogesh Khanna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
