Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Lalit Kala Akademi Vs Anshul Kumar — Writ and Judicial Review | Delhi HC (2019)

Home
Delhi HC
2019
Lalit Kala Akademi Vs Anshul KumarLalit Kala Akademi v. Anshul Kumar

Allowed

Lalit Kala Akademi v. Anshul Kumar

Delhi HC2 Dec 2019LPA/755/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Order dismissing a review petition against exemption orders allowed by this court, finding no reason to review the earlier order dated 02.12.2019.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

$~S-5.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

- LPA 755/2019

LALIT KALA AKADEMI ..... Appellant

Through: Mr. V.S.R. Krishna and Mr. V. Shashank Kumar, Advs.

versus

ANSHUL KUMAR ..... Respondent

Through:

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI

O R D E R

% 07.02.2020

C.M. No. 4119/2020

Parties & counsel

AI extract

appellant
LALIT KALA AKADEMI
respondent
ANSHUL KUMAR

Coram

AI extract

VIPIN SANGHI

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Delhi HC
Decided on: 2 Dec 2019 · December
Registered: 29 Nov 2019
Case no.: LPA/755/2019

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Cases Pertaining TO Spl.division Benches

Salek Ram Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
27 Nov 2019
Tata Communications Ltd. Vs UOI and Ors.
25 Nov 2019Writ Petition (Civil)
State Vs Sushil & Ors.
20 Nov 2019
M/S. Vodafone Idea Ltd. Vs Principal Commissioner of Income TAX-9
2 Dec 2019

Cite this judgement

Lalit Kala Akademi v. Anshul Kumar, LPA/755/2019 (DEL), decided on 2 December 2019.

The High Court of Delhi publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

VIPIN SANGHI and REKHA PALLI

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Allowed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Review petition dismissed as there was no reason to review the order dated 02.12.2019 which had allowed an application. Earlier exemption applications disposed of similarly, one with just exceptions and another allowing delayed application. No legal issue of general application raised here.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

The application stands disposed of.

C.M. No. 4116/2020

Since the delay is only 6 days. The application is allowed. The delay is condoned.

REVIEW PET. 50/2020 & C.M. No 4117,4118/2020

We have heard learned counsel for the appellant.

We do not find any reason to review our order dated 02.12.2019.

Dismissed.

VIPIN SANGHI, J

REKHA PALLI, J

FEBRUARY 07, 2020/ N.Khanna

REKHA PALLI

CNR

DLHC010015462019

Topic

Writ and Judicial Review

Bench

Cases Pertaining TO Spl.division Benches

Writ Petition (Civil)

Rolls-Royce Plc Vs Deputy Director of Income Tax, CIRCLE-2(1 ), International Taxation, New Delhi

2 Dec 2019

Rolls-Royce Plc. Vs Deputy Director of Income Tax, CIRCLE-2(1), International Taxation, New Delhi

2 Dec 2019