Dismissed
PRCIT-24 v. Shri Aditya Khanna
Delhi HCITA/938/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~40.
PRCIT-24
..... Appellant
Through: Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Adv.
versus
SHRI ADITYA KHANNA
..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Kislaya Parashar with Ms. Umang Luthra, Advs.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
%
O R D E R 06.11.2019
At the outset, learned counsel for the respondent, who appears on advance notice, points out that the tax effect in the present appeal is only Rs. 3 lakhs or so. Ms. Malhotra has submitted that as per her instructions the case is covered by the exception carved out in paragraph 10(d) of the circular dated 11.07.2018, which reads as follows:
“10. Adverse judgments relating to the following issues should be contested on merits notwithstanding that the tax effect entailed is less than the monetary limits specified in para 3 above or there is no tax effect:
(a) ........... (b) ........... (c) ....................
(d) Where the addition relates to undisclosed foreign assets/ bank accounts.”
A perusal of the impugned order shows that the issue does not relate to “undisclosed foreign assets/ bank accounts.” The issue relates to the credit claimed by the respondent assessee in respect of the tax paid to the State Authority in USA.
In our view, the case is, therefore, not covered by Exception carved out in paragraph 10(d) of the Circular dated 11.07.2018.
The present appeal is, therefore, not maintainable on account of the low tax effect and is disposed of.
VIPIN SANGHI, J
SANJEEV NARULA, J
NOVEMBER 06, 2019 N.Khanna
R.CIT-24
SHRI ADITYA KHANNA
VIPIN SANGHI
SANJEEV NARULA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court