The Delhi High Court restored the Defendant's statement filed on 06.02.2019 and held the injunction in the Single Judge's order of 27.03.2019 not operative. The court clarified the Single Judge has not finalized opinions on the expert report or merits of IA 1803/2019.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA
O R D E R % 09.04.2019
Caveat 371/2019
CM 16591/2019 (exemption)
FAO(OS) (COMM) 81/2019 & CMs 16590/2019 and 16592/2019
FAO(OS) (COMM) 81/2019 Page 1 of 3
FAO(OS) (COMM) 81/2019 Page 2 of 3
8. Dasti under the signatures of the Court Master.
S. MURALIDHAR, J.
I.S. MEHTA, J.
APRIL 09, 2019
rd
FAO(OS) (COMM) 81/2019 Page 3 of 3
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the statement made by the Defendant before the Single Judge on 06.02.2019 should be restored.
Whether the injunction clause in the impugned order of 27.03.2019 remains operative.
Whether the Single Judge has formed an opinion on the expert report.
NATCO PHARMA LTD
NOVARTIS AG & ORS
S. MURALIDHAR
I.S. MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
