The appeal and pending applications were disposed of as withdrawn and not pressed, respectively, following counsel's limited submission.
Appeal disposed as not pressed; both pending applications disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~23
..... Appellants Through: Mr. Arvind Kr. Nigam, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Arun Vohra & Mr. Gorangg Gupta, Advs.
versus
VIJAY KUMAR AGGARWAL ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Parag Tripathi & Mr. B.B. Gupta, Sr. Advs. with Mr. Tarun Singla, Mr. Shailesh Pandey, Mr. Naman Joshi, Mr. Ayush Jindal, Ms.Mohini & Ms. Spephalie, Advs.
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
O R D E R % 06.09.2019 CAV.857/2019
Since learned counsel for the caveator is present, caveat stands discharged.
FAO(OS) (COMM) 204/2019 & CM APPL.38250-38251/2019
After canvassing some arguments, Mr. Arvind Kr. Nigam, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellants, is not pressing this appeal.
In view of this limited submission, this appeal is disposed of as not pressed at this stage.
Both pending applications are also disposed of as withdrawn.
CHIEF JUSTICE
SEPTEMBER 06, 2019/ns
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
M/S RUDRA BUILDWELL RESIDENCY PVT LTD & ORS
VIJAY KUMAR AGGARWAL
C. Hari Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
