The single judge dismissed the appeal and connected applications as withdrawn by the appellant following a settlement between the parties. No substantive issues were adjudicated.
Appeal and connected applications dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~31
SANDEEP NAHATA ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Rohit Rathi, Advocate.
versus
PRAYAG POLYMERS PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS... Respondents Through: None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL O R D E R
% 09.01.2019
Mr. Rohit Rathi, learned counsel for the appellant, seeks permission to withdraw the appeal since the settlement has arrived at between the parties.
In the circumstances, the appeal along with applications, being C.M. No.50720/2018 & 50722/2018, is dismissed as withdrawn.
VINOD GOEL, J.
JANUARY 09, 2019
“shailendra”
Sandeep Nahata
Prayag Polymers Private Limited
Vinod Goel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
