Sushil Kumar Verma v. Jagdish Chandra Pawa
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal against eviction order dismissed as withdrawn by appellant. Suit for possession decreed with eviction decree and recovery of arrears on appellant's terms of payment and vacating premises.
What did the court decide?
Eviction decree passed; arrears of Rs. 1,52,609/- to be paid in instalments; possession to be vacated by 30.04.2021.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1
*** IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI**
% Judgment delivered on: 23.12.2019
- FAO 323/2019 & CM APPL. 36253/2019
SUSHIL KUMAR VERMA ..... Appellant
versus
JAGDISH CHANDRA PAWA ..... Respondent
Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Appellant: For the Respondent:
Mr. Akshay Bhatia, Advocate. Mr. Sachin Verma, Advocate.
CORAM:HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
JUDGMENT
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL)
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal seeking quashing of the eviction order should be allowed when the appellant seeks to withdraw it.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sushil Kumar Verma
- respondent
Jagdish Chandra Pawa
Coram
Sanjeev Sachdeva
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court