Suneeta Anand v. Jag Mohan Sawhney and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Short order listing parties to record a settlement on a future date in a civil suit involving Suneeta Anand and Jag Mohan Sawhney.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~25
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CS(OS) 2844/2014 and I.A. 15904/2018
- SUNEETA ANAND ..... Plaintiff
Through: Mr. Vikram Dogra and Mr. Samrat Nigam, Advocates (M: 9810732435).
versus
JAG MOHAN SAWHNEY AND ORS .... Defendants Through: Mr. Arxind Sharma, Advocate for D- 1 and 2 (M: 9811736977).
CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH
O R D E R
% 08.03.2019
Counsels for the parties submit that disputes have been settled and they wish to place on record the settlement terms. Parties shall remain
present on the next date, for recordal of the settlement.
Coram
Prathiba M. Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
M/S Indian Potash Ltd. Vs Media Contents and Communication Services (India) Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
Rita Solomon & Ors. Vs the Republic of Italy & Anr.
M/S Delhi Apartments Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S C.R. Sons Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd.
Mukul Katariya (Minor) through His Legal Guardian Smt. Pinki and Anr. Vs Sh. Rambhool and Anr.