A single judge order where the plaintiff sought a refund of court fees after the matter was settled and a decree was passed. The court held that the plaintiff is entitled to the refund under Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870.
Application disposed of; plaintiff held entitled to refund of court fees under Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~OS-23
SMT JATINDER KAUR ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Rajender Agarwal, Adv.
versus SMT HALGA KHURANA & ORS ..... Defendant Through
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH
O R D E R
% 04.02.2019
IA No.1712/2019
By this application it is prayed that necessary directions be passed to refund the court fees. The matter was settled through Agreement between the parties before the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre. This court had passed a decree on 9.7.2018.
In view of section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 the plaintiff shall be entitled to refund of the Court fees.
Application stands disposed of.
JAYANT NATH, J
FEBRUARY 04, 2019 n
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a refund of court fees under Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 in light of the settlement between the parties.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
JAYANT NATH
As recorded by the court registry
A civil suit filed on the original side of a High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
