This criminal revision petition challenged an order granting interim maintenance. The High Court found no ground to interfere in the impugned order, dismissing the petition.
Interim maintenance granted to respondent; petition dismissed; miscellaneous application closed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~21
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of Decision: 09.12.2019
+ CRL.REV.P. 90/2016 and Crl.M.A. 2029/2016
IN THE MATTER OF:
JITENDER BHARDWAJ ..... Petitioner
Through: Ms. Kajal Bhatia, Adv.
Versus
ANITA & ANR. ..... Respondents
Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J (ORAL)
CRL.REV.P. 90/2016 Page 1 of 3
CRL.REV.P. 90/2016 Page 2 of 3
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI (JUDGE)
DECEMBER 09, 2019 ga
3 of 3
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the revision petition assailing the Family Court's order granting interim maintenance should be allowed.
Whether the petitioner has approached the Family Court with clean hands given the discrepancy in his income affidavit.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jitender Bhardwaj
Anita
Respondent No. 2
Manoj Kumar Ohri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
