Dismissed

Amrik Singh v. State NCT of Delhi

Delhi HC13 Feb 2019CRL.M.C./798/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenged an order initiating proceedings under Section 82 Cr.P.C. under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Court directed Trial Court to expedite petitioner's pending application for warrant cancellation. Petitioner subsequently withdrew the proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Application for exemption allowed; stay petition dismissed as withdrawn; Trial Court directed to hear pending application on 15.2.2019.

Amrik Singh Vs State NCT of Delhi — Quashing and FIR | Delhi HC (2019)

¶1

$~36

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.M.C. 798/2019 & CRL.M.As.3234-35/2019 AMRIK SINGH ..... Petitioner

¶4

Through: Mr. O.N. Sharma, Adv.

¶5

versus

¶6

STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR O R D E R % 13.02.2019

¶7

CRL.M.A. 3234/2019 (for exemption)

¶8

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of.

¶9

CRL.M.C. 798/2019 & CRL.M.A.3235/2019 (for stay)

¶10

The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) for setting aside the impugned order dated 24.11.2018 in Complaint Case No.2715/2017 passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate (NI Act), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi whereby proceedings under Section 82 of the Cr.P.C. are directed to be initiated against the petitioner.

¶11

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has already moved an application before the Trial Court for the cancellation of the non-bailable warrants and recalling of the

¶12

proceedings under Section 82 Cr.P.C. on 4.2.2019, however, the concerned Metropolitan Magistrate was on leave earlier on the date fixed and now, the said application is fixed for hearing on 18.2.2019.

¶13

A prayer has been made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the Trial Court may be directed to take up the said application at the earliest and protection may be granted to the petitioner till the disposal of the said application.

¶14

In view of the above submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court does not deem it proper to issue notice to the respondent. However, in the interest of justice, the Trial Court is directed to pre-pone the date and take up the application on 15.2.2019 and dispose of the same in accordance with law.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner, at this stage, submitted that in view of the aforesaid directions, he may be allowed to withdraw the petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application is also dismissed as withdrawn.

¶16

Order be given dasti under the signature of Court Master.

¶17

CHANDER SHEKHAR, J

¶18

FEBRUARY 13, 2019/rk

Amrik Singh v. State NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amrik Singh v. State NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mufik Ahmed @ Munna & Anr. Vs State & Anr.

Ashok Goel Vs State & Ors.

Paramjit Singh Gill & Ors. Vs State & Anr.

Sanjay Khan Vs State and Another

Prem Narain Sharma Vs Central Bureau of Investigation

Chintan Shailesh Shah & Ors. Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.