The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR registered under Sections 498-A and 34 of the IPC. The Court held that since the parties had voluntarily settled their disputes via a Settlement Deed, no fruitful purpose would be served in continuing criminal proceedings.
FIR No. 394/2017 under Sections 498-A/34 IPC and proceedings emanating therefrom were quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~4
versus
STATE & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, APP with SI Subhash Chand, PS:Okhla Industrial Area, New Delhi Mr. Data Ram, Advocate for respondent No.2
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR O R D E R
CHANDER SHEKHAR, J
FEBRUARY 19, 2019 tp
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the FIR under Sections 498-A/34 IPC should be quashed in view of a settlement between the parties.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Ravinder @ Ravi & Ors.
State & Anr.
Chander Shekar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
