Allowed

Jai Dutta @ Jai Kishan & Ors. v. State & Anr.

Delhi HC24 Oct 2019CRL.M.C./5506/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Delhi allowed a petition to quash an FIR and consequent proceedings. The court noted that the parties, originally husbands and wives, had reached an amicable settlement via the Delhi Mediation Centre and the complainant now declines to prosecute, rendering further prosecution pointless.

What did the court decide?

FIR No. 0240/2016 dated 25.05.2016 registered at Police Station Khyala and consequent proceedings were quashed.

Jai Dutta @ Jai Kishan & Ors. Vs State & Anr. — Matrimonial and Divorce | Delhi HC (2019)

¶1

$~48

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

Date of decision: 24.10.2019

¶4

- CRL.M.C. 5506/2019

¶5

JAI DUTTA @ JAI KISHAN & ORS. ..... Petitioner Through Mr. G.B. Garg with Mr. Manish Kumar, Advs.

¶6

versus

¶7

STATE & ANR. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Izhar Ahmed, APP for State Ms. Pooja Gupta, Adv. for R-2 SI Rawat Singh, PS Tilak Nagar ASI Sunil Kumar, PS Khayala

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT

¶10

J U D G M E N T (ORAL)

¶11

Crl. M.A. 39152/2019

¶12

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶13

Application is disposed of.

¶14

CRL.M.C. 5506/2019

¶15

Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.

¶16

0240/2016 dated 25.05.2016 registered at Police Station Khyala and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.

¶17

CRL.M.C. 5506/2019

¶18

Page 1 of 3

¶19

Notice issued.

¶20

Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.

¶21

The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 06.12.2014 as per Hindu rites and rituals. One child was born out of the wedlock namely Kavyansh . Due to extreme incompatibilities between the petitioner no. 1 and respondent no.2, they started living separately.

¶22

The petitioners and respondent no.2 with the intervention of their well wishers and relatives have entered into an amicable settlement vide order dated 23.12.2017 before the Delhi Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi and settled all their disputes amicably.

¶23

The complainant is present in person with her counsel and has been identified by SI Rawat Singh of Police Station Tilak Nagar and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.

¶24

Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash the concerned FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioners any further.

¶25

CRL.M.C. 5506/2019

¶26

Page 2 of 3

¶27

For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No. 0240/2016 dated 25.05.2016 registered at Police Station Khyala and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

¶28

The petition is allowed accordingly.

¶29

Order dasti .

¶30

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE

¶31

OCTOBER 24, 2019 ms

¶32

CRL.M.C. 5506/2019

¶33

Page 3 of 3

Jai Dutta @ Jai Kishan & Ors. v. State & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jai Dutta @ Jai Kishan & Ors. v. State & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pratyush Sinha Vs State & Anr.

Ritesh Vs State & Anr.

Chaman & Anr. Vs State & Anr.

Arun Gupta Vs the State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

Davender Vs State & Ors.

Sh. Ajay Sharma & Anr. Vs State & Anr.