The本片 high court listed an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for directions on 29th March 2019, subject to orders of the Chief Justice, without disposing of the matter in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~14
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
OM PRAKASH CHAUTALA ..... Petitioner
Through Ms. Mallika Chadha, Mr. Amit Sahni and Mr. Anshul Bajaj, Advocates. versus THE STATE & ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr. Chaitanya Gosain, Advocate for Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel (Crl.) for State.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
O R D E R % 27.03.2019
Crl. MA No. 6530/2019 (under Section 482 Cr.PC, 1973 filed by the petitioner for seeking directions)
List this application before a Bench of which one of us, Manoj Kumar Ohri, J. is not a member, for directions on 29th March, 2019, subject to and after obtaining necessary orders of Hon’ble the Chief Justice.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J
MARCH 27, 2019/ RS
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Om Prakash Chautala
The State
Siddharth Mridul
Manoj Kumar Ohri
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
