The Court dismissed a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of proceedings in an NDPS case, holding that it was inappropriate to intervene as the matter was at the charge consideration stage where the petitioner could raise grievances before the trial court.
The petition and the pending application were dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~19
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Decided on:- 12th July, 2019
VINDHYACHAL MISHRA @ DUBE JI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Arvind Kr. Shukla, Mr. Nihal Ahmad, Mr. Kunal Yadav, Ms. Neena, Ms. Zia Ahmed & Ms. Reetu Sharma, Advs.
versus
STATE OF NCT DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for the State.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA
ORDER (ORAL)
Crl. M.C. No.480/2019
Page 1 of 4
Crl. M.C. No.480/2019
Page 2 of 4
prosecutor also pointed out that documents had been initially supplied to the petitioner under Section 207 Cr.P.C. as far back as on 12.11.2018.
Crl. M.C. No.480/2019
Page 3 of 4
R.K.GAUBA, J.
JULY 12, 2019 nk
Crl. M.C. No.480/2019
Page 4 of 4
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the Court should allow proceedings to be quashed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. despite the case being at the stage of consideration of charge.
Whether the petitioner must raise grievances regarding evidence supply before the trial court instead of approaching the High Court.
Whether procedural delays alleged by the petitioner are sufficient to justify intervention under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
4 provisions across 1 enactments
Vindhyachal Mishra @ Dube Ji
State of NCT Delhi
R.K. Gauba
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
