On January 08, 2019, a bench with Justices Siddharth Mridul and Yogesh Khanna disposed of a petition. The petitioner's attorney stated the minor daughter had been recovered and restored to parents, rendering further directions unnecessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
RAJENDER ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Sunil Kumar, Adv
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Chaitanya Gosain, Adv for Mr.Rahul Mehra, SC (Crl.) for State with Insp. Prem Singh and SI Arun Kumar, PS Ghazipur
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA
Mr.Sunil Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, does not press this petition, at this stage, in view of the circumstance that the petitioner’s minor daughter Moni, aged about 14 years, has since been recovered by the Delhi Police and restored to the custody of her parents.
No further directions are called for. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
YOGESH KHANNA, J
JANUARY 08, 2019 SU/
Rajender
State (NCT of Delhi)
Siddharth Mridul
Yogesh Khanna
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
