The High Court of Delhi allowed a criminal revision application with exceptions, granting the petitioners liberty to avail alternative remedies before dismissing the accompanying writ petition as withdrawn.
CRL.M.A. allowed subject to exceptions with liberty to recover by alternative remedies; W.P. dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~17
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MR. VIKAS JAIN & ANR ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr Sanjeev Sagar, Ms Vibha Mahajan Seth and Ms Nazia Parveen, Advocates.
versus
CSB BANK LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr S. K. Garg with Mr Girish Verma, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R % 20.12.2019
CRL.M.A. 43207/2019
W.P.(CRL) 3550/2019 & CRL.M.A. 43206/2019
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
DECEMBER 20, 2019 MK
Mr. Vikas Jain & Anr
CSB Bank Ltd
Vibhu Bakhru
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
