Shiv Bhagwan Goel v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner sought to withdraw a petition for quashing an FIR and was permitted to urge pleas before the trial court at the charge stage. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
What did the court decide?
Permission granted to withdraw petition with liberty to urge pleas before trial court at charge stage.
What the court decided
$~45
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CRL.M.C. 3175/2019 & Crl.M.A. 13052-53/2019
SHIV BHAGWAN GOEL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sachin Mittal, Advocate
Versus
STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M.S.Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
O R D E R % 05.07.2019
In this petition, quashing of FIR No. 2/2016, under Section 420/34 IPC and Sections 18/27 of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, registered at Crime Branch, Delhi is sought.
At the outset, learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to urge the pleas taken herein before the trial court at the stage of charge.
In view of aforesaid, this petition and applications are accordingly disposed of with liberty to petitioner to urge the pleas taken herein before the trial court at the charge stage.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Shiv Bhagwan Goel
- respondent
State
Coram
Sunil Gaur
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court