The High Court held that the petitioner has an efficacious remedy under Section 154(3) of the Cr.P.C. for registration of a case. The petition was disposed of without granting the sought directions.
No directions issued; petition disposed stating petitioner can approach authorities under Section 154(3) Cr.P.C.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~7
MR. SURESH KUMAR LAHIRI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Dalip Kumar Santoshi, Advocate.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Piyush Singhal, Advocate for State.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R % 07.11.2019
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
NOVEMBER 07, 2019 RK
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to issue directions for registration of a criminal case under the Prevention and Corruption Act, 1988.
Whether the petitioner proceeds with the present petition or avails the remedy under Section 154(3) of the Cr.P.C.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
MR. SURESH KUMAR LAHIRI
UNION OF INDIA
VIBHU BAKHRU
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
