Suraj v. the State & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Delhi, in a criminal revision petition, considered the quashing of an FIR based on a compromise deed and subsequent settlement between the parties, alongside the petitioner's remorse and socioeconomic background.
What did the court decide?
FIR No.0160/2017 and proceedings quashed; Rs. 20,000 payment conditionally imposed to specified funds.
What the court decided
$~10
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CRL.M.C. 2711/2019
- SURAJ & ANR. ..... Petitioners
Through: Mohd. Aamir and Mr.Vijay Kumar, Advs.
versus
THE STATE & ORS .... Respondents Through: Mr.Amit Chadha, APP with SI Gaurav Dalal, Sangam Vihar, Delhi R-2 in person
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR O R D E R
% 14.08.2019
- The petitioners have filed the present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing of FIR No.0160/2017, under Sections 323/324/341/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’), registered at P.S.: Sangam Vihar, Delhi and the proceedings emanating therefrom.
- Amended memo of parties as well as status report stands filed.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the FIR and criminal proceedings can be quashed in view of the settlement between the parties and the petitioner's remorse.
How thehen, once了什么
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Suraj & Anr.
- respondent
The State
Coram
Chander Shekhar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court