Dismissed
Mahtab Singh v. State & Ors.
Delhi HCW.P.(CRL)/1800/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL)…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~37
Through Ms. Shivani Pruthi, Advocate alongwith petitioner in person
versus STATE & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr. Sanjay Lao, Additional Standing Counsel (Criminal) with Inspector Nipur Kumar and SI Ajay Meena, P.S.: Narela Industrial Area CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI
Issue notice.
Learned Additional Standing Counsel (Criminal) accepts notice and submits that the Additional SHO/Inspector Nipur Kumar, P.S.:Narela, who is present in court, has been asked to change the IO and the same will be done today itself.
In view of the above submission, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition.
The petition is, therefore dismissed as withdrawn.
BRIJESH SETHI, J
SEPTEMBER 02, 2019 savita
MAHTAB SINGH
STATE
BRJESH SETHI
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court