Dismissed
Mohd. Shakil @ Bhola v. State
Delhi HCW.P.(CRL)/1593/2019
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioner withdrew the writ petition which became infructuous; court dismissed it as withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~64
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- W.P.(CRL) 1593/2019 MOHD. SHAKIL @ BHOLA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate (DHCLSC). versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms Shivani Sharma, Advocate for Ms Richa Kapoor, ASC for State.
¶4
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R % 05.09.2019
¶5
- The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that the petition has become infructuous. He seeks to withdraw the same.
¶6
- The same is dismissed as withdrawn.
¶7
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
¶8
SEPTEMBER 05, 2019 RK
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
MOHD. SHAKIL @ BHOLA
- respondent
STATE
Coram
AI extract
VIBHU BAKHRU
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court