A writ petition seeking directions to quash FIR and issue orders against a conspirator involved in FIR registration was disposed of without further orders as the cancellation report was already filed.
No orders passed for quashing FIR or issuing directions; petition disposed of due to filed cancellation report.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~34
PAWAN KUMAR
..... Petitioner
Through Mr Vishnu Sharma, Mr Trilochan Ravi, Advocates.
versus
THE STATE & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr Amit Kumar, Mr Sushant Chauhan, Advocates for R6. Inspt. Satya Prakash, EOW. Sh Vishnu Sharma, Mr Trilochan Ravi, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R
% 03.09.2019
petitioner.
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
SEPTEMBER 03, 2019 pkv
1 issue framed by the court
Whether directions should be issued to the respondents to take action against the alleged conspirator to register the FIR.
Pawan Kumar
The State
Vibhu Bakhu
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
