This order dismisses a petition seeking quashing of an FIR under Section 498-A IPC due to unresolved controversies regarding the implementation of a settlement agreement between the parties.
Petition dismissed with liberty to file afresh after resolving controversies with respondent no. 2.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~52
MISHRI LAL YADAV & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr Parveen Kumar, Advocate.
versus
STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr Amit Peswani, Advocate for State. ASI Satya Pal, PS Moti Nagar. Mr Krishan Kumar and Mr L.S. Gautam, Advocates for R-2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R % 18.09.2019
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
SEPTEMBER 18, 2019 RK
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present petition for quashing FIR under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC should be entertained given controversies regarding the implementation of a settlement.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
MISHRI LAL YADAV & ORS
STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI)
Krishan S/o Sh. Sunil Yadav
VIBHU BAKHRU
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
